Questions were popping up after the massive tsunami hit the Japan on the reliability of the lean systems. Many people, including lean experts had their say on the subject. One of the common areas all the critiques comment on is the high vulnerability of the lean supply chain to a disaster. Even if the manufacturer doesn’t suffer, if the supplier does, then the manufacturer will have to eventually stop his production. Yes, there can be contingency plans in place. But still it is a bigger risk. Any risk for your supplier is a risk for you. Even a single day delay from one of your key supplier, will eventually bring you in to a halt. This is what exactly happened after the Japanese tsunami. Production is still not into full capacity in Toyota, and the full output is expected only in the early June. This is scary, regardless of whether you follow lean or not.
But the truth of the matter is, lean is not disaster proofed. It is vulnerable to any disaster just like any other system would be, or even sometimes little more. But let’s not forget the problems your system face if it runs the non-lean way.
When the system is not lean, you obviously will not be tightly coupled to your supply chain as you would do in a lean scenario. You may be able to go on for weeks, even if you do not get anything from your suppliers. What this means is you have this stock in-house. In case of a disaster, you will do much damage as your entire inventory will be destroyed. But one positive is, if you have stocks to work with, you will not be halted by the problems hit your supplying means. For an example, if your ports are damaged, you will not suffer, but only if you or your supplier is hit, you will suffer.
This goes to show, each system has its own share of risk, depending on the disaster they face. But the truth is, while we plan for the possibilities, we should work on probabilities. Not every day there will be a tsunami. But lean brings you savings, efficiencies and improvements every day. Probably, when you select the suppliers, you may go for a tight geographical grouping to avoid the associated risks. Or you may find a way to keep your operations going with some other means. Just another possibility for improvement.
But for me the most important lesson taught by this event was the fact that nature is very powerful, and we must respect it.
19 comments:
Risk cannot be eliminated.
Risk can be analyzed, planned for and mitigation steps taken.
Risk and risk mitigation - that is the issue.
A short list of Catastrophic Risks:
Supplier Interruption
Earthquake + Tsunami = Rare and unpredictable.
Huge Tornado = Less Rare, more predictable.
And what of revolution, war, epidemic...
Compare to:
Everyday manufacturing quality issues.
Change in Market Demand - Obsolescence.
Product Recall - Design Failure
How much risk is tied up in inventory?
Is inventory an asset or a liability?
Suppliers all in one area?
Dangerous if next door to Fukushima.
Suppliers spread all over the globe?
Single Source = no alternative
Just different risks.
All life is a risk.
Risk cannot be eliminated.
Do your best to understand and mitigate risk. Stuff happens.
Tsunami has caused Toyota to lose production. Not adhering to lean practices has caused General motors and Ford to lose market share and suffer serious losses. Toyota will recover in two to three months. How long will it be before Ford and GM become consistently profitable?
rightly said nature is bigger than any system
What ever one plans there will be few cases where all planning will fail and will cause all kind of loses. In TPS loses will be there but recoverable at a much faster pace.
we can't eliminate risk but we can quantify the outcomes in every scenario. . . Loses incurred by the company with a lean system, due to a disaster is only a fraction of the savings they realized . . .
If Suppliers are in one location it is good for transportation. But, will affect by natural disaster.
If they are spread around every one will not affect by natural but it is difficult for transportation.
We can not consider everything when planning, We can plan only what best and improve from there.
Natural disasters can hit anywhere and anytime,nobody can control it but the money lost due to halted production is peanuts against the advantages of lean- metered inventory,lesser lead time,fast response to market demands and last but not the least work culture.
No surprise in this decision as we know People and Partners were the assets of Toyota.
May be Toyota is not first in short term but their are the best ever
We have to implement Kizen in Lean System, by continuously improving and making suitable changes as per situations.
Richard L
nobody can predict or plan for natural disasters. However, market dependency on a given product or integrated elements can be delineated by planing and organizational structured procedures. Lean is a case in point whereby integrated interests in a manufacturing environment can be seen to minimse outside influences.
great sir,you involved the importance of supplier in beautiful way. but i think the consumption rate w'll also influence the production rate . becoz the people get effected by tsunami w'll lead the production rate slow. and this greater effect you can see as a BULL WHIP EFFECT.
Anonymous said...
great sir,you involved the importance of supplier in beautiful way. but i think the consumption rate w'll also be influence the production rate rate. becoz the people get effected by tsunami w'll lead the production rate slow. and this greater effect you can see as a BULL WHIP EFFECT.
7:12 AM
Lean system is made by man...Nature is infinite than any man-made system as it was designed by the power of Ultimate Being..
Nature's way is infinite...
I think that the impact of sustainable manufacturing to the environment (planet) is more important than the impact of some unpredictable risks,unsafe designs of fokoshima power plants. Lean manufacturing principles are an active tool used in sustainable manufacturing systems .thus the benefits gained from lean manuf.can cover any loses in some regions because of natural disasters.
Amir tisinli
Nobody has control over nature, but Lean has nothing to do with it. The organization can not store inventory forever. In respect a disaster recovery system (supplier from other geographies) would mitigate the risk to some extent.
Nature is supreme...
Me personal opinion is that they must work with stock in exchange providers are like brothers, but to diminish the risk of supply to me while I work with many more suppliers, even if earnings are not the same, with small orders at the same time, so I assure production needs. I just can not do another one and when I will meet my need.
Regarding geography, the way I choose suppliers in different areas within a radius of ... (This depends on transportation costs and negotiations)
True nature is most powerful and no one has control over it, what ever system you follow nature has power to pull down them, but it does not mean we need to stop following better system, as you said Tsunami does not happen every day
Post a Comment
Anything to say. Please feel free to leave your comment below.